Compass: Charting the Evolution of Outdoor Gear

Deja Shoe Profile

        Home Brands History Firsts Classics Logos Links Books News Action About



The Deja Shoe story is so similar to Nau that one could easily imagine they were twins separated at birth. A company nudged along by an industry elder,

recruits experienced industry heavy hitters to produce a product line made completely from recycled or renewable/biodegradable materials. It donated 5%

of takings to environmental causes and would create an unprecedented buzz in it’s industry, generating millions in free advertising. And just as it was

getting into stride, ironing out business bugs, it failed to secure operational funds. Oh, and they were based in Oregon too.

The Fairy Tale

It’s is fable that begins with Julie Lewis, a fanatical recycler who decided that all the society’s waste should not go to landfill but to new useful product.

Inspired by the developing world sandals she’d seen made from car tyres she set out to make her own version.

To build on her passion to the cause, Julie got two big breaks. She was able to obtain invaluable advice and support from Bill Bowerman, co-founder and

design genius behind the company that would become Nike. [Just as Bill pioneered the waffle sole for sports footwear, the inspiration behind Nau, Eric

Reynolds designed some of the first sleeping bags and jackets to use Gore-Tex.] Julie also secured a $110,000 grant to produce a run of her recycled


Five thousand shoes were made. But they had quality control problems, so Julie enlisted the help of ex-executives from sport shoe company Avia. Their

industry nous helped Julie and the growing team navigate their way through what was involved in new green start -up.

Deja Shoe’s core market difference - recycled materials - was also one of their most significant business hurdles. The footwear industry, at that time, left

it to outsourced shoe manufacturers to locate materials required for production. Everyone did it this way. But in Deja Shoe’s case this was not possible,

due to the very special nature of their fabrics and finishings. So the company spend a lot of time, energy and money sourcing recycled feedstock, getting

it processed into footwear grade materials, and supplying it to shoe makers.

The extra work involved in establishing supply of these new materials, coupled with their short runs of a new styles, conspired to make the shoes more

expensive than their competition.

Industry Impact

The first six months of formal operations in 1991 were funded out of the ex-Avia executives own pockets. But by early 1992 they’d secured 2.5 million in

venture capital. Unfortunately, the shoe upper material they’d run with for the first full commercial released in 1993 (a short fibre recycled cotton from

Canada) was not very durable and returns came flooding in.

But with the $1.5 + million USD in sales they did manage to create, and another $5 million in a fresh round of venture capital, the company took time to

perfect their next line of shoes. Released in 1994 it sold so incredibly well, that 14 countries were quickly signed up for international expansion. All this

growth was helping provide an economy of scale for the exotic materials that Deja Shoe employed providing better pricing and margins.

But then just as all looked set to go ballistic one of their three original venture capitalist chose not to reinvest. Almost $11.5 million in funding had been

found to this point. But no new investors were quickly forthcoming and company, ethical to the end, wound up early so it could pay off debts. You can

read the gory details here in a two part PDF case study.

Yet, just as Nau has 15 years later, Deja Shoe made an industry look up and take notice. All the big boys responded back in the mid 90’s with footwear

that had some element of recycling.

And they needed to because Deja Show was generating an estimated $5 million plus, annually, in free marketing and advertising. People loved the story.

Nordstrums, REI, LL Bean and Bloomingdales being just some of the US retailers wanting some of the action.

It was a remarkable marketing tool that Deja Shoe had at its disposal. One that at its heart was genuine and and infused with integrity.

The Product

Uppers were made from the industrial trim waste from disposable nappies/diapers, of hemp, of Vegetal leather from Amazonian rainforests, from

salvaged denim jeans, of wool felt, of recycled PET drink bottles, of an animal free leather.

Soles were of reground car tyre rubber and from cork. The padded collar and tongue of foam from seat cushions of chairs. The logo badge from recycled

milk jugs, the footbed from recycled wool jumpers and recycled EVA foam. The lasting board from recycled coffee filters, the underfoot padding from

neoprene wetsuits and rubber gasket production waste.

Deja Shoe were so thorough with their recycling that they produced a list of how much pre and post consumer recycled content was in each model and

how much each contained of sustainably harvested materials. Each of the 22 different materials had its own fact sheet in the retail training manual.

But the commitment didn’t stop with the product’s materials. Deja Shoe pioneered water-based adhesives instead of the industry standard toxic solvent

glues. Although made in China, their factories were not military or state managed. The company had strict Global Sourcing Guidelines.

Their office furniture was all pre-loved reuse pieces. Their trade show and retail store display materials were high post-consumer recycled content. Even

the incredibly detailed ring binder (remember, this was pre worldwide web days)crammed with company information used a recycle content.

The footwear came in the niftiest of shoe boxes. Printed with soy based inks, they used no adhesives or staples and could be unfolded and refolded into

attractive storage boxes.

Julie Lewis was adamant that Deja Shoe would donate 5% of pre-tax profits to the Species Survival Commission of the World Conservation Union. The

company had an 18 point Corporate Policies statement. Point 13. “Leather-Free Footwear. We will use no leather in the manufacture of Deja Shoe

footwear, because of the health and environmental impacts associated with leather processing and the ecological consequences related to over-

consumption of animal products.”)

They saw themselves as “a for-profit, cause-led environmental company.

The Legacy

For such effort the company was awarded the United Nations Environmental Fashion award, the top Edison award for Environmental Achievement from the

American Marketing Association and the Best Recycling Innovation award from the US National Recycling Coalition.

But due to that aforementioned unavailability of investment capital it only lasted four years. The inspired brand name and left-over stock was sold off.

Julie Lewis was not however easily  thrown off course. Teaming up with Bob Farentinos, who been head of Environmental Affairs at Deja, she created a

new company called Deep E Co and produced some similar styles. But being a much smaller scale operation it failed to gain the necessary market

traction. Later Julie would try again with, an anagram of Deja, Jade Planet. The hemp and recycled Pachira boot from Jade is a small reminder of what

could’ve been, if Deja Shoe had hung in there.

One could reasonably argue that Worn Again, Simple’s EcoSneaks & Green Toe, Patagonia Footwear, and the like, all owe a great deal to Deja Shoe. And

maybe END Footwear too.

NB: This profile was originally written as an article for